• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Cheyney Goulding

Cheyney Goulding Solicitors

t: 01483 56 76 76   e: legal@cheyneygoulding.co.uk

alt-text

  • Home
  • About
  • Business Services
  • Wealth Management
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Insights

Wealth Management

Asset protection Trusts

10/01/2020 by Christopher Seddon

Can I protect my assets during my lifetime?

We are all keen to protect our assets for our loved ones, during our lifetime AND after our death. We want to do the best for our spouse/partner and children. However, there are many questions that need addressing before the right planning can be put in place.

What if my spouse remarries after my death?

Assets they have inherited from you could pass to their new spouse rather than to your children. Many people forget that when they marry, or remarry, their existing Will is usually revoked and they are intestate, meaning most of the estate will pass directly to the new spouse, not your children or other chosen beneficiaries.

What if I leave assets to my children and one of them then divorces?

Potentially 50% of the gift you have made to your child may end up with your ex in-law.

What about Care Home fees?

If a person owns assets valued in excess of £23,250 and they require long term care, they will usually be required to make a 100% contribution towards the cost of their care from income as well as from capital assets.

There are detailed rules that we can explain to you, but the sheer cost of care needs to be carefully considered.

Can an Asset Protection Trust help?

The use of a Trust can often solve many of these common problems. It can avoid the need for the family to get a Grant of Probate for the assets held in the Trust. This reduces cost and delay.  A side benefit from employing this kind of planning is that assets held within the Trust can frequently be protected from the impact of long term care fees, unless it can be proved that at the time the Asset Protection Trust (APT) was set up it was reasonably foreseeable that the donor would enter long term care. This would then mean that the Local authority would claim that there had been a deliberate deprivation of capital and an attempt to avoid paying Care fees.

Do I need a Will as well as an Asset Protection Trust help?

A Will is essential planning, but an Asset Protection Trust (“APT” for short) can work alongside the Will to give you a myriad of benefits. It is designed to protect your assets during your lifetime, as well as giving you the peace of mind that your estate can pass on securely and intact to your spouse and the rest of the family (or other named beneficiaries) after your death.

The Trust in effect ring fences your assets. In most cases this means protecting your family home, although sometimes savings can also be safeguarded. Just like a safety deposit box, assets can be added and removed from the trust during your lifetime to a limited degree.

You would usually be named as the main beneficiary and retain control of the assets within the trust while you are alive and have capacity, so you are free to move home or release equity from it.

As well as protecting the assets during your lifetime the trust can continue to work after your death. The trust can continue to hold assets safely within it and pay them out to in accordance with your wishes. Although there are no inheritance tax benefits for your estate, second generations onwards can benefit hugely in this respect. The trust itself can continue to protect your family for up to 125 years and is extremely flexible. This means that the benefits are not just for you but also for your children, grandchildren and even great grandchildren.

Is there any limit on how much I put into the APT?

You can put assets to the value of your Nil Rate Band (presently £325,000) into the APT, but anything additional to that creates an immediate charge to lifetime Inheritance Tax (20% of the value over the current Inheritance Tax nil rate band placed within the Trust).

However, after seven years more assets can be added, with a similar restriction. Once more you must be careful that this does not constitute a deprivation of capital and assets.

 What type of assets can be placed within the APT?

Most people put their share of their home into the ATP. Sometimes savings can also be protected in the Trust.  We can advise on this.

Practical aspects of the Trust.

Throughout your lifetime you retain full benefit from all the assets within the APT. You can also choose who your Trustees are from time to time, so you stay in control. You can live in your house and enjoy it. If you are not able to live in your own home the house can be sold or rented. Upon your death, assets within the APT can pass directly to the beneficiaries named in your Trust, or remain protected by the Trust, be loaned to your beneficiaries, then repaid to the Trust on their death or divorce. The Trust can then loan the assets out again. This protects the assets and has great IHT benefits.

Potential benefits of the Trust.

FINANCIAL PROTECTION FROM RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS

Many people are concerned about the effects of remarriage after first death and the risk of “sideways disinheritance”, where assets are allowed to move out of the bloodline and benefit a non-family member. This trust, however, allows you to benefit your spouse, without the risk of losing assets to his or her new spouse or children in the future.  By ring fencing your assets within the trust prior to marriage/cohabitation, you can make it much harder for these assets to be taken from you in the event of a relationship breakdown. This will also protect your children and grandchildren from losing their inheritance should their relationships fail in the future.

RING FENCING YOUR ASSETS

The trust provides better protection for everybody than a straightforward gift to your children would. The capital value of the property does not pass to them until after you have died and so if anything happens to any of them (for example divorce, bankruptcy or if they die before you), then your rights in relation to the property are protected and they have nothing that can be claimed against.

PROTECTION FOR YOUR DEPENDANTS WHO ARE RELIANT ON STATE BENEFITS

When assets are inherited by someone that is dependent on state benefits, receiving an inheritance will often result in the loss of this income. The trust protects the assets so your beneficiary will still qualify for state support. This is a particularly useful benefit of the trust where a beneficiary has a condition that will prevent them from supporting themselves in the future.

PROTECTION FROM INHERITANCE TAX

Assets held within an APT do not form part of the taxable estate of your beneficiaries. This means that assets passing to your son or daughter will not be taxed on their death, potentially saving your grandchildren from large amounts of inheritance tax. Your grandchildren will inherit from your trust, not from the estate of their parents.

It is, however, very important to remember that the APT is not a tax planning tool during your lifetime, and assets protected by it will not fall outside your estate for inheritance tax purposes. This is because you are named as the main beneficiary during your lifetime, and you therefore have what is known as a “reservation of benefit” in the assets held in the trust.

There are also restrictions on the value of assets that can be placed in the trust during any seven-year period. The trust itself will be registered with HMRC, and any tax return will be based on the assets held in the trust not your personal income.

On the 10th anniversary of the trust it will be assessed for a periodic charge. If the assets in the trust exceed the inheritance tax threshold on that date, a tax charge will apply. This is something that we can advise on in detail.

PROTECTION FROM CARE FEES

Many people feel that it is unfair to work throughout their lives only to have their home and savings at risk if they have to go into care in later years. A side effect of the APT is that assets properly held within the trust created at the right time can be protected from such care fees. It is essential that the trust be created at a time when it was not reasonably foreseeable that you would need to go into care.

Since the capital value of the property will no longer belong to you, if you go into care you can rightly say that you do not own your home, if you are asked. They may ask if you ever owned your property and when you gave it away. If they can show that you gave it away just to avoid payment of care fees, they can count it as yours anyway. However, they do have to show that this is why you gave the property away. The longer the gap between the gift of the property and you going into care, the harder it is for them to show this, especially if at the time of making the gift it was not reasonably foreseeable that you would go into care.

However, there are very strict rules against anyone deliberately depriving themselves of assets, and this type of trust cannot be used if the primary motivation is to avoid care fees.

In those circumstances the local authority may decide that a particular individual “deliberately deprived themselves of assets for the purposes of avoiding paying for care” and, in such a case, they would assess the contribution as if the settlor still had the assets.

If assets have been transferred (whether to a trust or outright) with the intent of avoiding using them to pay for care the local authority can try to recover theme from the person to whom the assets were given or put a charge over it.

Local Authorities can review medical and other records and so any pre-existing medical condition or even comments made while in discussion with Local Authority, social workers or carers, could become relevant at a later date.

However, if the APT was set up at the right time and in the right circumstances, for example when the person was in good health, living independently and with no prospect or intention of long-term care, then there should be no problem.

PROTECTION FROM BANKRUPTCY

If you are in business and would like to safeguard your personal assets from future business debts, the trust can keep them safe. However, you cannot protect assets that are already at risk. It does not prevent you from being declared bankrupt, but it can protect the assets within the trust itself. This also applies to subsequent generations of your family, preventing loss in the event of your children or grandchildren who suffer financial difficulties.

PROTECTION AGAINST ESTATE CLAIMS

If a claim is made against your state it can take many years to defend and cost thousands of pounds in legal fees. Assets held in and APT would normally not be subject to this type of claim.

NO PROBATE NEEDED.

You do not need Probate for the assets in the APT, which saves your family from potential lenghty delays, as well as the expense of probate fees.

LENDING RATHER THAN GIFTING ASSETS

The trust also allows you to “lend” your assets to your spouse after your death. These assets can then be repaid to the trust either on the death of your spouse, or on some other specified event (such as remarriage). The assets will then pass under the terms of your trust

There are various implications of doing this settlement, as follows:

You will no longer own the capital value of your property and so you would not be able to sell it and spend the money however you would like.

In summary, an APT can:

Protect assets for family members who can’t look after assets themselves

Protect assets from business creditors or divorcing spouses

Prevent an inheritance from affecting someone’s entitlement to state benefits

Provide for young children in an income tax efficient way

Provide for both a current spouse and children from an earlier relationship

Protect family members’ estates from large inheritance tax bills when they die

Reduce your spouse’s tax burden when you die.

We would be delighted to offer you a free initial meeting so that we can discuss what planning may assist you and your family. Please contact Christopher Seddon (cseddon@cheyneygoulding.co.uk) or another member of our team.

This article is for general commentary only and does not constitute legal advice.  If you would like to discuss any of the issues discussed in this article, please get in touch.

Cheyney Goulding LLP, solicitors in Guildford, Surrey

Filed Under: Wealth Management

Is it time to review your Will?

05/08/2019 by Samantha Cory

6 life events that should trigger a review of your Will.

No matter how old you are, an up-to date, professionally prepared Will is extremely important. A Will is the only way to ensure that your wishes can be fulfilled, as a Will clarifies what happens to your assets after you die, who will receive what, when they will get it and it can also include details on how these assets are managed. If you do not make a Will, your property will be shared out according to the intestacy rule, and you may not give the result that you would wish for. A properly drafted Will ensures that any gifts you wish to leave are given to the correct beneficiary. Without a Will, it may be legally necessary to sell items or could even lead to a family dispute.

With more couples living together as co-habitants, it is important to ensure that your partner will not be at risk should you die without a Will. The issue here is that the intestacy rules do not provide for cohabitees. These relationships do not have legal recognition and a ‘common-law’ partner has no automatic right to your possessions following your death. We can help tailor your Will to suit you.

It is important to keep you Will up-to-date and it is recommended that you should review your Will at least once a year but any major life events or imminent changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) means it would be wise to review your Will as soon as possible. In additional to an annual review, here we list 6 events which should trigger you to review your Will:

1.            Divorce

Any gift in your Will to your former spouse or civil partner will automatically become invalid from the date of your divorce/the dissolution of your civil partnership. Also, if you appointed your former spouse or civil partner as your executor this will no longer be valid. You should therefore make a new Will to reflect your new circumstances.

2.            Marriage

If your Will was not stated to be made in expectation of your marriage or civil partnership then your Will automatically ends when you get married or enter into a civil partnership. Unless you make a new will you will therefore die without a Will and the laws of intestacy will determine what happens to your assets.

3.            An executor or a beneficiary under your Will dies

Your Will may already provide for what happens in the event of the death of your executor or a beneficiary. However, if it does not, you may need to change your Will as this can lead to significant changes and potentially partial intestacy.

4.            You have new additions to your family

It is an exciting time when your family expands to include new children or grandchildren. You may want to change your Will to include new family members. If you are a parent with children under 18 you should always think about appointing a guardian, which can be included in your Will.

5.            Your assets have changed significantly

Sometimes Wills need updating because you either have more assets than you used to or because you no longer have the assets you used to have (e.g. you have sold your home). If specific assets have been named in the Will then it is important to ensure the Will is updated if these assets no longer exist as these gifts will fail.

6.            Amendments to laws affecting your Will

Taxation and legislation change constantly, much of which you may never hear about.  As tax treatment depends on individual circumstances, it is important to regularly review your Will with a professional, so they can advise of any changes that affect you and identify any amendments you can make to mitigate or benefit from those changes. This will allow you to maximise the estate you pass on to your nearest and dearest.

Here at Cheyney Goulding Solicitors, Guildford we will consider your individual circumstances and offer practical, straightforward legal advice, ensuring your wishes are reflected in your Will.

See other recent articles we have written:

Passing off

Buying and selling your home, a step by step guide

The section 1 statement – changes due in April 2020

Cheyney Goulding LLP, law firm in Guildford, Surrey

Filed Under: Wealth Management

Increase in probate fees to begin in April 2019

21/03/2019 by Samantha Cory

The Government announced in 2018 plans to introduce a new six-band probate fee structure which is set to replace the existing flat fee of £215 (or £155 when paid through a solicitor) to take effect in April 2019.

Probate fees are payable when the executors of an individual’s estate apply for a grant of probate to allow them to gather the assets of the estate and distribute them to beneficiaries in accordance with any directions set out in the individual’s Will.

Many have viewed these proposed changes with controversy with some expressing the view that it is no longer merely an administrative fee but a ‘stealth tax’ or ‘death tax’ being used to subsidise other areas.

The proposed new six-band system is as follows:

Value of Estate (Before Inheritance Tax) Proposed Fee
Up to £50,000 (or exempt from requiring grant of probate) £0
£50,000.01-£300,000 £250    
£300,000.01 -£500,000 £750
£500,000.01-£1 Million £2,500
>£1 Million – £1.6 Million £4,000
>£1.6 Million – £2 Million £5,000
>£2 Million £6,000

The reasons behind the controversy surrounding this newly proposed system are clear, as those with an estate valued over £2 Million could be facing between a 2,690 – 3,770 per cent increase on existing probate fees.

Should you like to know any further information, or should you have a question about how the proposed increase in probate fees may affect you, please do get into contact with a member of our probate team.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

PILOT SCHEME TO CAP COSTS AT £80K

03/07/2017 by Administrator

Pilot scheme to cap costs at £80k

Civil claims costs have always been scrutinised and measured on the proportionality principle and now there is a proposed scheme of levelling fixed costs for civil claims. Lord Justice Jackson is finalising his report on the capping of fixed recoverable costs for claims up to the value of £250k and has proposed a trial period for assessing the scheme. The trial period was to have started in May but had been delayed due to the election and now is due to start at any time.

Proposals for the capped stages

Costs would be capped at £10k for pre-action work, £7k for particulars of claim and £7k for defence and counterclaim.
Parties can claim up to £6k for a reply and defence to counterclaims
Case management conference will be capped at £6k
Disclosure will be capped at £6k
Witness statements will be capped at £8k
Expert reports will be capped at £10k
Trial and judgement costs limited to £20k
Overall cap of the pilot scheme trial period is set at £80k

Where will the pilot scheme take place?

Certain specialist courts have been selected. London Mercantile Court, three courts each in Manchester District Registry and Leeds District Registry and any cases where the trial will go beyond two days or where the value is more than £250k are excluded.The pilot scheme will be monitored by academics and will be open to new cases for two years.

The pilot committee all agree that there should be a streamlined court procedure, based around the Shorter Trial Scheme. Proposed amendments to court procedure would include a list of issues being reviewed at the claims management conference, including disclosure, limits on fact and expert evidence and trial dates would be fixed within eight months of the CMC.

The scheme is voluntary and both parties in litigation need to agree to participate.

Proposals for pilot scheme pre-action process

Response to letter of claim within 14 days
Particulars of claim and defences with counterclaims must not exceed 20 pages
Other statements of case must not go beyond 15 pages
Costs budgeting will not apply to cases in the capped costs list with the court instead making a summary assessment of costs

There will no doubt be further news on the proposed costs changes on the litigation landscape as the scheme may be extended to other courts.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

INCREASE IN PROBATE REGISTRY FEES – WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

30/03/2017 by Administrator

UPDATE – The MOJ have on the 21st April 2017, scrapped the proposed increase in probate fees. Whether this remains the case after the election is still to  be decided. 

The MOJ have recently announced a proposed increase in probate fees, despite strong objections from the legal profession.

The new proposed fees are to be based on the value of the estate left by an individual in their will, and will be set out in the following sliding scale:

Estate Value                                                      Proposed Fee

£50,000                                                                £0

£50k- 300k                                                           £300

£300k -500k                                                        £1,000

£500k- 1 million                                                 £4,000

£1m- 1.6m                                                           £8,000

£1.6m – 2m                                                         £12,000

£2m +                                                                    £20,000

The current fees are £215 or £155 for those applying through a solicitor.

It has been argued that the new sliding scale system is fairer, with the lower value estates being removed entirely from paying any probate fees. However with no set implementation date, solicitors and individuals alike who are dealing with high value estates, will likely be looking to ensure that all applications are submitted before the relevant date in order to avoid the hike in fees.

Solicitors with outstanding probate applications, will also need to ensure that there is no delay on their part in filing the relevant application, in order to warrant that no allegations of negligence arise.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

FIRST CASE UNDER THE INHERITANCE (PROVISION FOR FAMILY AND DEPENDANTS) ACT 1975 (IPFDA) TO REACH THE HIGHEST COURT

21/03/2017 by Administrator

In March 2017 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Ilott v The Blue Cross and Others in the first case under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (IPFDA)  to reach the highest court.

This was an appeal that arose out of a claim for reasonable financial provision under IPFDA brought against the estate of Mrs Jackson by her daughter Mrs Ilott. The pair had been estranged for the majority of the 26 years before Mrs Jackson’s death in 2004. The estrangement began when the daughter left home to live with her boyfriend, now husband when she was 17. Mrs Ilott has lived independently of her mother with her husband and five children but in challenging financial circumstances and receiving benefits of an annual income of £20,000.

Mrs Jackson did her last will in 2002 bequeathing the majority of her estate to a number of animal charities and made no provision for her daughter. Even in 1984 Mrs Jackson had made no provision for her daughter in her will and Mrs Ilott knew this and had no expectation of benefit from the estate.

The District Judge found that Mrs Jackson’s will did not make any reasonable provision for Mrs Ilott and awarded her £50,000. The charities who were beneficiaries in the will challenged the finding that there was any lack of reasonable provision but that challenge failed and the dispute has proceeded on the quantum awarded to Mrs Ilott.

In the Court of Appeal, the Judges decided that the District Judge had erred on two points in his calculation:

  1. Initially he held the award should be limited in light of the long estrangement and lack of expectation of benefit but did not identify what the awared would have been without these factors and the reduction attributable to them.
  2. He made his award without knowing what the effect would be on Mrs Ilott’s benefits, some of which would be means-tested and would not be payable once Mrs Ilott’s savings were over £16,000

The Court of Appeal re-evaluated the claim and awarded Mrs Ilott £143,000 to buy her house and an option to receive £20,000 in one or more instalments to prevent the awards affecting Mrs Ilott’s benefits’ entitlement.

Judgment of the Supreme Court

Overturning the Court of Appeal’s judgment, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the charities’ appeals and set aside the Court of Appeal’s order and restored the District Judge’s order of £50,000.The kernel of the decision was that the Court of Appeal had no proper basis for interfering with the judgment made by the District Judge and that the broad brush approach adopted by the District Judge was correct. The Supreme Court emphasised the importance of limiting awards to adult children to “maintenance”, highlighting that the purpose of the Act was NOT to provide legacies to an applicant. Reasonable provision for maintenance does not mean providing everything that the applicant reasonably needs but requires a single assessment by the judge and this assessment may be weighted by any of the factors in section 3 of the IPFDA, including estrangement; here the circumstances of the relationship  and estrangement between Mrs Ilott and Mrs Jackson carried weight.

Conclusion

Lady Hale in her judgment reviewed the history of the Act and preceding legislation, commenting on the unsatisfactory state of the law where it gives no guidance as to the weight of the factors to be taken into account in deciding whether an adult child is deserving or undeserving of reasonable maintenance. At the moment, the approach is of a value judgment which could be problematic as there are wide varying opinions in judiciary and public opinion as to the circumstances in which adult descendants ought or ought not to be able to claim on an estate.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT SCHEME RELIEF REQUIREMENTS

17/02/2017 by Administrator

The case of Abingdon Health Limited v HMRC involved the First-tier Tribunal considering the requirements for qualifying for relief under the enterprise investment scheme (EIS).   EIS is essentially in place to encourage investment in smaller or high risk companies by providing significant tax relief to investors.  To qualify a company must have no more than 250 employees and gross assets not exceeding £15 million immediately before the share issue.

The case considered the provisions of the Income Tax Act 2007 regarding one of the clear conditions for tax relief that the EIS shares must not carry any preferential rights to company assets on a winding up.   In this case the Tribunal decided that there was such a preferential right carried by the ordinary shares due to the creation of a new class of “growth” shares. As a result the Tribunal agreed with HMRC’s position to refuse the issue of a compliance certificate in respect of the third issue of ordinary shares, and furthermore to withdraw relief in respect of the first two issues of ordinary shares.   This is a reminder as to the need to ensure that the company’s articles of association and the issues of shares, including any share restructuring, comply with the EIS legislation and HMRC guidance in order to obtain the tax relief for the investors.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

REASONS TO MAKE OR REVIEW YOUR WILL.

22/08/2016 by Administrator

Careful preparation for end of life is required to provide peace of mind for yourself and your loved ones, that your wishes will be respected after you have gone. A Will clarifies what happens to your assets after you die, who will receive what, when they will get it and it can also include details on how these assets are managed. If you do not make a Will, your property will be shared out according to certain rules. These are the rules of intestacy, and they may not give you the result that you would wish for. A properly drafted Will ensures that any gifts you wish to leave are given to the correct beneficiary. Without a Will, it may be legally necessary to sell items or could even lead to a family dispute.

With more unmarried couples living together, it is important to ensure that your partner will not be at risk should you die without a Will. The issue here is that the Intestacy Rules do not provide for cohabitees. These relationships do not have legal recognition and a ‘common-law’ partner has no automatic right to your possessions following your death. We can help tailor your Will to suit you.

Have you recently reviewed your will?

Not only should you make a Will, it is important to review your Will regularly and ensure it still reflects your wishes.

What could need to be updated?

  1. Changes in your relationship or family deaths:

If you have had further children or grandchildren, then you may wish to change or update your Will accordingly. If you have married, remarried or registered a civil partnership then your Will is void. If you have got divorced since you last signed a Will, your Will is not void, however your ex partner will not usually be able to claim anything after you have gone. You should consider making changes to your Will however as ex-partners can contest Wills if they are still mentioned in them and this way it can avoid disputes.

  1. Changes in assets:

If you no longer have the assets previously gifted in your Will or you own new ones since your Will was made, a new Will should be made.

  1. Your Spouse passes away:

If a spouse were to pre-decease you, you may wish for your assets to go to another relative. You may also wish to distribute your assets in a different manner.

Filed Under: Wealth Management

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer Widget Header

 

Footer

Site map

  • Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Insights
  • Careers

© 2025 Cheyney Goulding LLP

Business Services

Business services

  • Commercial Agreements
  • Commercial Property
  • Corporate & M&A
  • Data Protection & Privacy
  • Dispute Resolution & Litigation
  • Employment
  • Finance, Lending & Security
  • Information Technology
  • Intellectual Property

Wealth Management Services

Wealth management

  • Inheritance Tax Planning
  • Later Life Planning & Care Home Fees
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Probate & Estate Administration
  • Trusts
  • Wills
  • Residential Property
  • Contentious Probate & Will/Inheritance Disputes
  • Court of Protection Advice & Applications

Contact

Phone Number:   01483 56 76 76

Fax Number:   +44(0)1483 30 05 38

Email:   legal@cheyneygoulding.co.uk

More

More

  • Complaints handling policy
  • Prices & services information
  • Privacy policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Cookie policy

Cheyney Goulding LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC329864 and VAT number 641411771. The registered office and principal place of business is at Ward House, 6 Ward Street, Guildford, GU1  4LH. The members are G.R. Young and T.M. Marshall.

Cheyney Goulding LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and our professional code of conduct can be accessed here.

Brand and Website by Supafrank. Photography by Matt Wreford